What were the arguments for and against the annexation of the Philippines? The people that were for annexing the islands argued that there were business interests in thoughts of new markets and fields of investments, the United States wanted to become an empire and so they wanted to expand more.
What were the arguments for and against the annexation of the Philippines?
Americans who advocated annexation evinced a variety of motivations: desire for commercial opportunities in Asia, concern that the Filipinos were incapable of self-rule, and fear that if the United States did not take control of the islands, another power (such as Germany or Japan) might do so.
Who was against the annexation of the Philippines?
Many anti-imperialists in the United States, such as Democratic presidential candidate William Jennings Bryan, opposed U.S. annexation of the Philippines, but in November 1900 Republican incumbent William McKinley was reelected, and the war continued.
What were expansionists arguments?
What arguments did expansionists make? – They wanted increased involvement in world affairs. They suggested promoting ecomimic growth and spreading American values.
Why were some American leaders opposed to the annexation of the Philippines?
How did some American labor leaders respond to the idea of annexing the Philippines? They were against it because they worried about losing jobs to cheap labor.
Was the annexation of the Philippines good?
Some thought has been given to the pros and cons of annexing the Philippines back into the United States. It could reinforce American interests in the region, reduce crime on the islands, and support a more democratic government.
Why did people not support the annexation of the Philippines?
On June 15th, 1898, the American Anti-Imperialist League was organized in response to the United States’s imperialist war in the Philippines. The American Anti-Imperialist League took the position that denying Filipinos their sovereignty was a direct contradiction of democratic principles.
What were two reasons against annexation of the Philippines?
The leagues presented five major arguments against annexation. First, they stated that annexing a territory with no plans for statehood was unprecedented and unconstitutional. Second, they believed that to occupy and govern a foreign people without their consent violated the ideals of the Declaration of Independence.
What was the annexation of the Philippines?
The annexation of the Philippines was the event in United States history in which the United States took control of the Philippines. … Instead, the US decided to take control of the Philippines. This led to a Filipino uprising and a war between some Filipinos and the US. The war lasted until 1902.
What are the factors that led to American invasion of the Philippines?
The conflict arose when the First Philippine Republic objected to the terms of the Treaty of Paris under which the United States took possession of the Philippines from Spain, ending the Spanish–American War.
What were the arguments for and against US expansionism?
The arguments for imperialism included the US and Europe’s desire to find new sources of raw materials, establish new markets for trade, spread Christianity and Western ideas, and create strategic military bases.
How did Hawaiians lose control of their islands quizlet?
How did Hawaiians lose control of their islands? U.S. business leaders took control of country and eventually Pres McKinley annexed the islands.
Why did the United States want to acquire Cuba?
After the Spanish American War, Americans were convinced that Cubans could not govern themselves. The Platt Amendment was then used to allow the U.S. to basically completely control Cuba trade and government. The U.S. then used Cuba for economic purposes by dominating their various industries, imports, and exports.